data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f062/5f062429f021415625c6a770ffdc7ffdfffaa9d4" alt="Boostnote review linux"
Thus it is well backed, although it might not fit into their core competency as well as some of their other products. Simplenote is a project run by Automattic, the company behind. Thus I have more experience with it than with any other tool here.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88291/8829148422833909fa093336ab44d25d2b28813f" alt="boostnote review linux boostnote review linux"
I feel I must admit that I have been a Simplenote user for several years now. If you would like to contribute a review to one of the applications listed here, or would propose a new entry to the list, please email me matthias at.
#BOOSTNOTE REVIEW LINUX MAC#
There are many many tools that are Mac only which unfortunately do not make the list. In general, this means Windows, Android, and the web. I can only review those applications which are available to me.
#BOOSTNOTE REVIEW LINUX FULL#
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb602/bb602466b7a6c00305a77dfa30291d9c84229483" alt="boostnote review linux boostnote review linux"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f2b3/3f2b31b054a152f10bee665b051672f9c0672d43" alt="boostnote review linux boostnote review linux"
Open sync - is it capable of syncing via an open source protocol or server?.Mobile - are there mobile applications for the tool?.Platforms - is it widely available on a broad range of platforms?.
#BOOSTNOTE REVIEW LINUX SOFTWARE#
In other words, if a product has a feature that is only available when you purchase the software or an account, it will receive full marks for that feature. While these could never be completely unbiased, I hope that the simple trinary scoring alleviates much of this concern.Īdditionally, a product will never be judged for charging its customers. That's a valid choice on the part of the tool. For example, the tool might prefer rich text over markdown and thus receive a -1 on markdown. 1: the feature does not exist, or exists in such a manner that it is unusable.Ġ: the feature exists, but is sub-par, difficult to use, or lacks a critical componentġ: the feature exists and is sufficient for typical use casesĪ -1 on a feature is not necessarily a bad thing - it might simply not fit in the grand scheme of that tool. I'm scoring each entry on the list based on criteria that are important to me, or that I feel would be important to others when deciding between them. So when they look back and question why we, the Franklins of our generation, chose the komputer over the trusty quill and papyrus, they'll catch a glimpse into this milestone of humanity. Thus I am writing this document for the sake of posterity, in an effort to lend an unbiased opinion to future generations. The agony of decision making is nigh on unbearable. We are faced with more choices than ever for our venerable note taking medium, which is both a curse and a blessing. Yet I'm becoming the hipster I swore I would never be and falling for this new medium called a komputor. I have some 30 notebooks in my closet, begging me to fill them up. When Benjamin Franklin sat down to write in his diary what would eventually become the Gettysburg Address, he agonized over his choice of medium - stick with the tried and true stone tablet with hammer and chisel, or lend credence to this new fangled paper and pen? Here I am, 972 years later, faced with a similar decision.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f23a8/f23a8cc33818c0e1761f167ab5e343d1b4d72333" alt="boostnote review linux boostnote review linux"
A Comparison & Review of Note Taking Applications
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f062/5f062429f021415625c6a770ffdc7ffdfffaa9d4" alt="Boostnote review linux"